Nasrallah

Haimovich stressed that while Israel’s tactical operations have been impressive, they are not enough to force Hezbollah's Nasrallah into a truce.

Nasrallah’s speech, when viewed through this lens, reads less like a statement of facts and more like a diary of denials.

A Muslim familiar with the historiographical context of these verses understands the meaning instinctively—“fighting is permitted.”

The two alone are now authorized "to take defensive and offensive actions against Hezbollah in order to fulfil Israel's war goals."

Yahya Sinwar's time is running out, and while there is little interest in an all-out war, Israel must take decisive military action to secure its borders and citizens.

Nasrallah defended Hezbollah's recent attack on Israel, named "Operation Arbaeen Day," as retaliation for the killing of Fuad Shukr and is committed to a prolonged conflict with Israel.

Bernie Sanders calls for permanent ceasefire • return of hostages while speaking at DNC • Blinken says IDF withdrawal must be part of hostage, ceasefire deal.

Nasrallah fully realizes that the decision to respond to Shukr’s assassination is not in his hands but in Tehran’s.

Israel has not yet responded. Hassan Nasrallah understands and smiles. And he is not alone.

This lack of political trust in Hezbollah outside the Shi’ite community translates into sustained criticism for waging a war against Israel without consulting other factions.